Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research on the Reform of Replacing Native Chieftains with Appointed Officials in Kham region at the End of the Qing Dynasty from the Perspective of the Chinese National Community

Abstract

Kham region is located between Sichuan and Tibet, serving as a vital passage connecting the two regions. It is also an important multi-ethnic area where various ethnic groups interact, exchange and integrate. It has always been highly valued by the central government. By the end of the Qing Dynasty, in the face of foreign aggression and acute internal conflicts in Kham region, the Qing government established the policy of "replacing native chieftains with appointed officials" to govern Kham region. Among them, Zhao Erfeng's series of policies implemented in politics, economy and culture were the most effective. These measures, while promoting the economic and cultural development of Kham region, an integral part of Chinese civilization, jointly maintained the "unified" pattern of the Qing Dynasty and enhanced the national identity of the people in Kham region. Moreover, from the perspective of historical development, the implementation of the policy of "replacing native chieftains with appointed officials" in Kham region at the end of the Qing Dynasty also holds significant value in maintaining and promoting the continuous development of the Chinese nation community.

Keywords

Late Qing Dynasty, Kham region, Reform of Replacing Native Chieftains with Appointed Officials, the Chinese National Community

PDF

References

  1. Naran Bilik, & Li, P. C. (2020). 四方铸牢中华民族共同体意识 [Forging a strong sense of the Chinese national community in all directions]. 广西民族研究, (1), 1–6.
  2. Chen, M. R. (2019). 论“中华民族共同体”的基本内涵 [On the fundamental connotation of the "Chinese national community"]. 广西民族研究, (5), 1–10.
  3. Wu, F. P. (1984). 赵尔丰川边奏牍 [Zhao Erfeng's memorials on frontier governance]. 四川民族出版社.
  4. Editorial Group of Historical Archives on Sichuan-Yunnan Frontier Affairs in the Late Qing Dynasty, Sichuan Pro-vincial Institute of Ethnic Studies. (1989). 清末川滇边务档案史料 [Historical archives on Sichuan-Yunnan frontier affairs in the late Qing dynasty]. 中华书局.
  5. Tibet Academy of Social Sciences, & Sichuan Academy of Social Sciences. (2001). 近代康藏重大事件资料选编 [Selected documents on major events in modern Kham-Tibet]. 西藏古籍出版社.
  6. Editorial Department of Tibetan Studies. (1982). 清实录藏族史料 [Tibetan historical materials from the Qing Veritable Records]. 西藏人民出版社.
  7. Yang, C. H. (2012). 凤全家书笺证 [Annotations of Feng Quan’s family letters]. 民族出版社.
  8. Ma, J. L. (2004). 清末川边藏区改土归流考 [Study on the "Gaitu Guiliu" reform in the Tibetan areas of Sichuan during the late Qing]. 巴蜀书社.
  9. Xu, J. (2019). 固边图藏:清末赵尔丰川边经营 [Frontier consolidation and Tibetan governance: Zhao Erfeng’s administration in late Qing Sichuan]. 中国社会科学出版社.
  10. Xu, M. (1982). 清末川边藏区改土归流初探 [Preliminary study on the "Gaitu Guiliu" reform in the Tibetan areas of Sichuan during the late Qing]. 西藏研究, (2), 113–122+95.
  11. Cheng, X. M. (1988). 改土归流与康区社会:上 [Gaitu Guiliu and society in Kham: Part I]. 中国藏学, (3), 27–33.
  12. Ma, J. L. (2001). 清末川边藏区“改土归流”的宏观历史分析 [A macro-historical analysis of "Gaitu Guiliu" in the Tibetan areas of Sichuan during the late Qing]. 西藏研究, (3), 82–87.
  13. Zhao, Y. T. (2002). 清末川边改革新探 [New explorations on frontier reforms in Sichuan during the late Qing]. 中国藏学, (3), 38–49.
  14. Ma, G. J., & Li, H. X. (2012). 清末康区“改土归流”的动因及后续影响 [Motivations and follow-up effects of "Gaitu Guiliu" in Kham during the late Qing]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3), 15–22.
  15. Cai, L. P., & Dai, W. (2019). 危机与应对:凤全事件后清政府对康区的治理 [Crisis and response: Qing governance of Kham after the Feng Quan incident]. 四川民族学院学报, (1), 6–12.
  16. Wu, Y. Q. (2007). 清末民国时期川藏关系研究 [Study on Sichuan-Tibet relations from the late Qing to the Republican era]. 云南人民出版社.
  17. Jia, D. Q., & Chen, S. S. (2018). 四川通史:清代卷 [General history of Sichuan: Qing dynasty volume]. 四川人民出版社.
  18. Wang, Y. W., & Wang, L. (2015). 清季外交史料 [Diplomatic historical materials from the late Qing]. 湖南师范大学出版社.
  19. Wang, T. Y. (1957). 中外旧约章汇编:第1册 [Compilation of old treaties between China and foreign countries: Vol. 1]. 生活·读书·新知三联书店.
  20. Zhang, S. J. (2015). 19世纪后期至20世纪初英国构建“印度安全”战略与中印边界争端问题的源起 [British "Indian security" strategy and the origin of the Sino-Indian boundary dispute from the late 19th to early 20th century]. 思想战线, (1), 122–129.
  21. Fei, X. T. (1989). 中华民族的多元一体格局 [The pluralistic unity structure of the Chinese nation]. 北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (4), 3–21.
  22. He, Y. H., Liu, Q. R., & Han, G. F. (2012). 落日余晖:赵尔丰康区改土归流记 [The twilight glow: Zhao Erfeng’s "Gaitu Guiliu" in Kham]. 中国文史出版社.
  23. Lin, J. H. (2004). 试论康巴文化的多元性 [On the cultural diversity of Kham]. 康定民族师范高等专科学校学报, (3), 10–15.
  24. Tu, W. T. (2007). 四川教育史:上 [History of education in Sichuan: Vol. 1]. 四川教育出版社. 四川出版集团.
  25. Editorial Committee of Gazetteer of Garzê Prefecture. (1997). 甘孜州志:下 [Gazetteer of Garzê Prefecture: Vol. 2]. 四川人民出版社.
  26. Editorial Committee of Gazetteer of Chamdo Prefecture. (2005). 昌都地区志:下 [Gazetteer of Chamdo Prefec-ture: Vol. 2]. 方志出版社.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 19

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.