Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Contract Risk Management for Cultural and Tourism Projects in EPC+O Mode

Abstract

Driven by the policy of deepening the implementation of the rural revitalisation strategy and the deep integration of culture and tourism, the EPC+O model is becoming the preferred paradigm for large-scale culture and tourism projects due to its full-cycle integration capability. However, its contract risk management still faces the multi-dimensional challenges of cultural adaptation, operational benefits, and policy compliance. In this paper, 35 risk factors are identified through an empirical study of relevant literature, and the indicators are optimised using the questionnaire survey method to form a contract risk evaluation index system that includes 4 guideline levels, 10 level 1 indicators, and 32 level 2 indicators. The weights of the evaluation indexes are calculated by the comprehensive assignment method, combining the entropy weighting method and hierarchical analysis method. The contract risk evaluation model of the general contractor for the EPC+O mode cultural tourism project is constructed by the grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Taking the Hunan Shaoyang Wujiang Night Tour cultural tourism project as an example, the established contract risk evaluation index system and evaluation model are used to evaluate the contract risk of the project, and the risk control measures are proposed for the risk indicators with the most significant risk value of the project. The scientificity and applicability of the evaluation model are verified, providing tools for contract risk management of the EPC+O cultural tourism project, which has specific positive significance for the development of contract risk management.

Keywords

EPC+O Model, Comprehensive Empowerment Method, Contract Risk Evaluation Model, Risk Control

PDF

References

  1. Tengfei Wang, Wenzhe Tang,Lei Du,Colin F. Duffield & Yongping Wei.(2016).Relationships among Risk Management, Partnering, and Contractor Capability in International EPC Project Delivery.Journal of Management in Engineering,32(6),04016017-04016017.
  2. Ignacio Escuder-Bueno,Guido Mazzà,Adrián Morales-Torres & Jesica T. Castillo-Rodríguez.(2016).Computational Aspects of Dam Risk Analysis: Findings and Challenges.Engineering,2(3),319-324.
  3. Badalpur, M. , & Hafezalkotob, A. . (2015). Methodology based on mcdm for risk management in epc projects: a case study of lpg storage tanks construction. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 8(3), 1-23.
  4. Ignacio EscuderBueno, Guido Mazza, Adrian MoralesTorres, jesica T.CastilloRodriguez.(2016). Computational aspects of dam risk analysis: findings and challenges. Engineering(3), 319-324.
  5. Zhao, Xianbo, Liu, Junying, Yan, & Peng. (2016). Risk paths in international construction projects: case study from chinese contractors. Journal of construction engineering and management, 142(6), 5016002.1.
  6. Jian Hu,Jin Hua Sun,Jian Ming Yan,Zhen Liu & Yu Ren Shi.(2012).Multi-Objective Ant Colony Algorithm in EPC Risk Control.Procedia Engineering,29(C),1767-1773.
  7. Junying Liu,Xianbo Zhao & Peng Yan.(2016).Risk Paths in International Construction Projects: Case Study from Chinese Contractors.Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,142(6),05016002-05016002.
  8. Zekun, Lin, Huiying, & Chen. Research on Tourists' Perception Evaluation of Cultural Tourism Resources in Maiji Mountain Grottoes. Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Humanities (AEMH 2019).
  9. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China,School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia,School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China,International Research Centre for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China,School of Engineering, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia,School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China & International Research Centre for Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.(2019).Case-based reasoning approach for supporting building green retrofit decisions.Building and Environment,160,106210-106210.
  10. Shen, W. (2014). EPC project management: Insights from the Philippines Mariveles project. Electrical Technology, (12), 3–6.
  11. Zhang, J. (2004). Research on process, methods, and models of project risk analysis [Master’s thesis, Nanjing University of Science and Technology].
  12. Zhang, H., & Tian, M. (2007). Application of reliability analysis in survey questionnaire design. Statistics and Decision, (21), 25–27.
  13. Xiao, Z. (2021). A preliminary study on entropy reduction management: The case of Huawei. China Circulation Economy, (28), 63–65.
  14. Lin, S. (2020). Research on venture capital evaluation system for blockchain startups. China Collective Economy, (29), 80–81.
  15. Sun, C., Chen, J., & Su, C. (2021). Evaluation and research of spatial planning index system for water infrastructure in plain river network areas based on AHP. Water Resources Planning and Design, (03), 8–11+56.
  16. Feng, W., & Liu, Y. (2018). Credit evaluation of hydraulic engineering contractors based on grey comprehensive evaluation model. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 36(2), 129–135.
  17. Xu, N. (2020). Research on risk management of prefabricated construction projects based on EPC mode [Doctoral dissertation, China University of Mining and Technology].
  18. Dong, F., Xiao, M., Liu, B., et al. (2010). Analysis of whitening weight function construction methods in grey system teaching. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 31(3), 97–99.

Similar Articles

11-17 of 17

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.