Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Adaptation and Challenges: The State, Impact, and Corporate Implementation of Global ESG Disclosure Regulations

Abstract

In the current global context, the disclosure of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) information has emerged as a crucial factor influencing investment decisions and corporate evaluations. This has led to strengthened regulatory requirements aimed at enhancing the transparency and quality of disclosures. This paper thoroughly investigates the regulatory frameworks for ESG information disclosure and the challenges faced by companies in adapting to these regulatory demands. It analyzes how regulatory bodies formulate and implement policies, as well as how companies respond to these policy requirements. Employing a comparative research approach, this paper analyzes the ESG information disclosure regulatory policies across different countries and regions, uncovering the key elements of effective regulatory practices and the differences between regions. Additionally, through case studies, this paper deeply explores the main challenges companies face in complying with ESG information disclosure requirements, such as the complexity of data collection and processing, inconsistencies in performance evaluation standards, and the issues related to the cost and benefit assessment of disclosure. By systematically analyzing the interaction between regulatory frameworks and corporate practices, this paper aims to guide companies in effectively dealing with the complexities of global ESG information disclosure, while also providing references for regulatory bodies to develop more effective policies.

Keywords

ESG Disclosure, Regulatory Frameworks, Global Challenges, Corporate Compliance

PDF

References

  1. Cheng, W. (2024). Theoretical interpretation and normative shaping of increased obligations on digital platforms. Study and Exploration, (02), 62-72.
  2. Duan, M. (2024). Study on ESG information disclosure and its influencing factors in Chinese commercial banks. International Business Accounting, (03), 44-48.
  3. Ding, Z., Jiang, J., & Chen, R. (2024). The disagreement in climate finance accounting and its underlying political logic: An analysis based on the constructive ambiguity perspective. Southwest Finance, 1-13.
  4. Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.
  5. Huang, Z. (2024, February 26). International Sustainability Standards Board releases first adoption guide outline. Daily Economic News, (8).
  6. Huang, J., Wang, Y., Han, F., & Li, Y. (2023). ESG information disclosure: Conceptual analysis, evaluation methods, and mechanisms. Foreign Economics & Management, 45(6), 3-18.
  7. Hou, D., & Wei, Y. (2023). Construction of ESG information disclosure framework for listed companies: From the perspective of new development concepts. Finance and Economics Law, (05), 3-17.
  8. Jiang, P., Shao, S., & Wang, X. (2024). Research on transformational financial support for the development of high-carbon industries in Tianjin. North China Finance, (02), 66-74.
  9. Jiang, P., & Jin, H. (2024). The road to common prosperity: Corporate ESG performance and labor income share. Modern Finance (Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics), (03), 54-68.
  10. Li, Z., Shao, Y., Li, Z., & Li, M. (2022). ESG information disclosure, media supervision, and corporate financing constraints. Scientific Decision Making, (07), 1-26.
  11. Lou, Q. (2023). ESG information disclosure: Legal reflection and institutional construction. Securities Market Herald, (03), 24-34.
  12. Liang, X., Yang, X., & Zhang, C. (2024). Can common institutional ownership reduce the cost of equity capital? Accounting Friend,(05), 62-69.
  13. Peng, Y. (2023). Optimization of ESG information disclosure system: EU experience and Chinese reflection. Securities Market Herald, (11), 43-55.
  14. Song, X., Pan, J., & Han, J. (2024). The spur effect of capital market internationalization: A-shares inclusion in the MSCI index and corporate ESG performance. Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, 1-20.
  15. Tang, X., Zhang, X., & Yang, L. (2024). Regulatory small shareholders and corporate ESG performance—Evidence from the Investment Service Center pilot. Quantitative Economics and Technical Economics Research, 1-18.
  16. Wang, Y., Cheng, Y., & Dong, S. (2024). Can corporate ESG performance promote real asset investment? Accounting Friend, (06), 105-113.
  17. Wang, J., Wang, X., & Yi, L. (2024). Research on carbon finance service model innovation for the supply chain. Southwest Finance, 1-13.
  18. Wang, J., Wang, X., & Yi, L. (2024). The synchronicity study of management tone on corporate ESG performance: The case of Haier Smart Home. International Business Accounting, (03), 38-43.
  19. Xie, H., & Gu, X. (2024). Green credit system under ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin. People’s Yellow River, 1-6.
  20. Xu, X., & Wang, Z. (2022). Main practices and implications of ESG information disclosure by overseas enterprises. Macro-Economic Management, (02), 83-90.
  21. Yao, S., & Zhao, Y. (2024). The effect of environmental information disclosure in A+H cross-listing: Mechanisms and pathways. Foreign Economics & Management, 1-16.
  22. Zhang, X., Qin, D., & Yang, Y. (2024). Study on the impact of digital transformation on corporate income distribution. Western Forum, 1-17.
  23. Zhao, Q., & Li, H. (2024). Does ESG rating promote corporate green technology innovation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Southern Economy, (02), 116-135.
  24. Zhou, Y. (2024). Research on the development of financial support for carbon inclusiveness: Constraints, practical experience, and policy recommendations. Southwest Finance, 1-10.
  25. Zhang, B., Liu, Z., Zhou, J., & et al. (2024). Analysis of the impact of supply chain concentration on the ESG performance of Chinese listed companies—From a business management perspective. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 1-25.