Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Coexistence Challenges in the AI Era: Social Robots and Human Networks

Abstract

The rapid integration of social robots into everyday life in China is transforming human social networks, creating unprecedented “coexistence dilemmas” that blend opportunities for companionship with significant ethical challenges. This study examines the emergence of social robots as quasi-human actors, their capacity to engage in emotional and social interactions, and the resulting tensions with established interpersonal norms. Drawing on the Chinese policy context and ethical theories—including virtue ethics, responsibility ethics, and the ethics of care—the paper analyzes four core issues: anthropomorphic misalignment, privacy and data security risks, ambiguity in responsibility attribution, and emotional manipulation. Case studies such as Xiaoice illustrate how design choices, corporate practices, and regulatory gaps influence these challenges. The study proposes a multi-level ethical framework that combines human-centered design principles, robust accountability mechanisms, cultural sensitivity, and user education to ensure that social robots enhance rather than erode human relationships. By aligning technological innovation with ethical governance, this framework aims to guide the harmonious integration of social robots into China’s evolving socio-technical landscape.

Keywords

social robots, human–AI coexistence, ethics, anthropomorphism, privacy, responsibility

PDF

References

  1. Bakir, V., & McStay, A. (2025). Move fast and break people? Ethics, companion apps, and the case of Character. ai. AI & SOCIETY, 1-13.
  2. Chen, J. . (2025). Research on Intergenerational Synergy Mechanism in Village-s Driven by Digital Technology: Exploration of Realistic Paths Based on an Ageing Society. Journal of Global Trends in Social Science, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.70731/0hnbek71
  3. Chen, W., & Luo, Y. (2025). An inclusive governance framework for artificial intelligence: Practical logic, endogenous advantages, and systemic construction. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202504.0444.
  4. Dou, X. (2022). Ethical issues and policy recommendations regarding social robots. Think Tank Theory and Practice, 7(05), 103–110. https://doi.org/1 0.19318/j.cnki.issn.2096-1634.2022.05.12
  5. Fu K, Ye C, Wang Z, Wu M, Liu Z and Yuan Y (2025) Ethical dilemmas and the reconstruction of subjectivity in digital mourning in the age of AI: an empirical study on the acceptance intentions of bereaved family members o f cancer patients. Front. Digit. Health 7:1618169. https://10.3389/fdgth.2025.16.18169
  6. Feng, J. (2019). The impact of robot expressiveness and proactiveness on user perception in interaction. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 46(1), 111–117.
  7. Galasen. (2025). Research on the personal information protection system of co mprehensive archives from the perspective of governance. Archives Comm unication, (03), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.16113/j.cnki.daxtx.2025.03.013
  8. Government of the People’s Republic of China. (2019). Our country issues the “Governance Principles”: promoting responsible artificial intelligence develo pment [News release]. Chinese Government Portal. Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-06/18/content_5401128.htm
  9. Li, L., & Deng, Z. (2025). Mediatization of communication subjects: On the evolution of social robots. Contemporary Communication, (02), 65–69, 76.
  10. Ma, S., & Zhu, Z. (2024). Moral responsibility attribution in artificial intelligen ce: An analysis based on Strawson’s reactive attitude theory. Studies in Sci ence and Technology Philosophy, 41(05), 79–85.
  11. Norskov, M. (2021). Social robots: Boundaries, potential, and challenges [社交机器人:界限, 潜力和挑战]. Peking University Press.
  12. Wang, Y., & Yang, H. (2021). Privacy protection in precise marketing under bi g data. News Enthusiast, (12), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.16017/j.cnki.xwahz.2021.12.009
  13. Wang, D. (2023). On the data security protection obligations of data processors. Contemporary Law Review, 37(2), 40–49.