Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

An Interpretation of Aristophanes’ Eulogy in Plato’s Symposium

Abstract

Plato’s Symposium centers on the praise of the god of love, Eros, bringing together various perspectives on desire from prominent Greek intellectuals. Among them, Aristophanes’ encomium stands out for its mythopoetic expression, reflecting the comic poet’s profound insight into human nature, society, and politics. Through the allegory of spherical humans split in half by Zeus, Aristophanes suggests that desire originates from humanity’s longing for an original state of wholeness. This eros is not merely a response to bodily trauma, but also a yearning for self-identity and the unity of the soul.

The article further reveals that Aristophanes attributes higher value to love between men, thereby reflecting the interconnection between political ideals and gender order in ancient Greek society. Moreover, by analyzing rhetorical devices, temporal structure, and the redemptive function of Eros, the paper explores the mechanisms of irony and metaphysical symbolism embedded in Aristophanes’ speech. Love, in this view, is not only an expression of emotion and desire, but also a philosophical response to the fractures within the self and the ruptures of history. As a comic poet, Aristophanes deftly employs humor and myth to construct eros as a complex structure that traverses the domains of nature, ontology, society, and power.

Keywords

Wholeness, Gender Politics, Symposium, Aristophanes, Eros, Conception of Love

PDF

References

  1. Plato, B. (2019). Symposium. BookRix.
  2. Nehamas, A. (2007). ‘ONLY IN THE CONTEMPLATION OF BEAUTY IS HUMAN LIFE WORTH LIVING’PLATO, SYMPOSIUM 211d. European Journal of Philosophy, 15(1).
  3. Sun, C. Y. (2019). The virtues of unfulfilment: Rethinking eros and education in Plato’s Symposium. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 53(3), 491-502.
  4. Vasseleu, C. (1991). The face before the mirror-stage. Hypatia, 6(3), 140-155.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00260.x
  5. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction, volume I. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage, 95, 1-160.
  6. Salih, S. (2007). On Judith butler and performativity. Sexualities and communication in everyday life: A reader, 55-68.
  7. Fu K, Ye C, Wang Z, Wu M, Liu Z, Yuan Y. Ethical dilemmas and the reconstruction of subjectivity in digital mourning in the age of AI: an empirical study on the acceptance intentions of bereaved family members of cancer patients[J]. Frontiers in Digital Health, 2025, 7: 1618169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1618169.
  8. Plato. (2006). Phaedo. ReadHowYouWant. com.
  9. Nietzsche, F., & Hollingdale, R. J. (2020). Thus spoke zarathustra. In The Routledge Circus Studies Reader (pp. 461-466). Routledge.
  10. Wang, Y. (2022). Reflections on divine–human relations in Plato’s Symposium: Based on Aristophanes’ speech. Appreciation of Famous Works, (14), 41–45.
  11. Lin, Z. (2017). Aristophanes’ view of eros in Plato’s Symposium. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences Edition), 35(3), 21–27.
  12. Chen, S. (2021). Eros and politics: The myth of Aristophanes in Symposium. Modern Philosophy, (04), 112–118.
  13. Li, P. (2011). Annotations on Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposium. Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy (First Ten-Day Issue), (31), 80–81.
  14. Yao, J. (2005). Political philosophical thought in Plato’s Symposium. Gansu Agriculture, (07), 100. https://doi.org/10.15979/j.cnki.cn62-1104/f.2005.07.100.