Vol. 2 No. 7 (2025)

Research Articles

The Historical Context and Realist Orientation of Erich Auerbach's Figural Interpretation (Figura)

Published 2025-07-31

  • Shanshan Yang
    • ,
  • Pengshan Li

Shanshan Yang
Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea

Pengshan Li
Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

Abstract

In the 1930s, Erich Auerbach, exiled amid Nazi antisemitism and Aryan philology, revived the Latin-patristic concept of figura: a historical-grammatical method connecting Old Testament prophecy to New Testament fulfilment. In contrast to the prevailing pure philology of the period, figural interpretation embraced a teleological view of history, transforming Hebrew scripture from narrowly Jewish law into a cultural bridge linking everyday reality and transcendental redemption. This article argues that Auerbach’s figural interpretation constitute not merely a philological method but a cultural-political theory consciously devised to defend Judeo-Christian humanism and redefine Western literary realism. By tracing the concept’s patristic origins, examining its wartime deployment against Nazi ideology, and highlighting its role in Mimesis—where mixture of styles elevates ordinary experience into the primary measure of literary realism—the article demonstrates figural interpretation as a threefold intellectual strategy: sharpening historical insight, confronting cultural-political crises, and innovating literary criticism.

Keywords

Erich Auerbach, Figural Interpretation, Aryan Philology, Mixture of Styles, Realism of Everyday Life

PDF

References

  1. Ankersmit, F. R. (2002). Historical Representation. Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/art-and-visual-culture/historical-representation
  2. Arvidsson, S. (2006). Aryan Idols: Indo-European Mythology as Ideology and Science (S. Wichmann, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
  3. Auerbach, E. (1961). Dante, Poet of the Secular World. University of Chicago Press.
  4. Auerbach, E. (1965). Literary Language & Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages. Princeton University Press.
  5. Auerbach, E. (2014). Time, History, and Literature: Selected Essays of Erich Auerbach. Princeton University Press.
  6. Auerbach, E., & Said, E. W. (2013). Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature - New and Expanded Edition. Princeton University Press.
  7. Augustine, S. (2010). The Trinity (The Fathers of the Church, Volume 45). CUA Press.
  8. Efal, A. (2009). Panofsky’s Idea and Auerbach’s Figura, Two Philological Iconodulist Experiments. Bezalel Journal, 4. https://journal.bezalel.ac.il/en/protocol/article/3056#_edn57
  9. Efal, A. (2012). Philology and the History of Art. In R. Bod, J. Maat, & T. Weststeijn (Eds.), The Making of the Humanities: Volume II: From Early Modern to Modern Disciplines (pp. 283–300). Amsterdam University Press. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9789048517336-015/html?srsltid=AfmBOoqk4716wpThBDdn8gTpaTrOjwCUGnIJJ5zJDFArFfca04meHGD5
  10. Evola, J. (2018). The Myth of the Blood: The Genesis of Racialism. Arktos Media Ltd.
  11. Heschel, S. (1994). Nazifying Christian Theology: Walter Grundmann and the Institute for the Study and Eradication of Jewish Influence on German Church Life. Church History, 63(4), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/3167632
  12. Hovind, J. (2012). Figural Interpretation as Modernist Hermeneutics: The Rhetoric of Erich Auerbach’s “Mimesis.” Comparative Literature, 64(3), 257–269.
  13. Lerer, S. (1996a). Literary History and the Challenge of Philology: The Legacy of Erich Auerbach (1 edition). Stanford University Press.
  14. Lerer, S. (Ed.). (1996b). Literary History and the Challenge of Philology: The Legacy of Erich Auerbach. Stanford University Press.
  15. Lewis, C. T., & Short, C. (1879). Fĭgūra [Perseus Digital Library]. http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0059:entry=figura
  16. Lury, C., Viney, W., & Wark, S. (2022). Introduction: Figure, Figuring and Configuration. In C. Lury, W. Viney, & S. Wark (Eds.), Figure: Concept and Method (pp. 1–20). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2476-7_1
  17. Olender, M. (1992). The languages of Paradise: Race, religion, and philology in the nineteenth century. Harvard University Press.
  18. Philo. (2004). Philo, Volume I: On the Creation. Allegorical Interpretation of Genesis 2 and 3 (F. H. Colson & G. H. Whitaker, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
  19. Ramelli I. (2009). Origen, Patristic Philosophy, and Christian Platonism Re-Thinking the Christianisation of Hellenism. https://doi.org/10.1163/157007208X377292
  20. Rosenberg, A. (1993). The Myth of the Twentieth Century: An Evaluation of the Spiritual-intellectual Confrontations of Our Age. Noontide Press.
  21. Seland, T. (2014). Reading Philo: A Handbook to Philo of Alexandria. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
  22. Snediker, T. (2024). Figural Interpretation and the Logic of Supersession [UC Santa Barbara]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/78r1s8qx
  23. Uhlig, C. (1996). Auerbach’s “Hidden” (?) Theory of History. In S. Lerer (Ed.), Literary History and the Challenge of Philology: The Legacy of Erich Auerbach (pp. 36–49). Stanford University Press. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9780804764766-005/html?srsltid=AfmBOoquemFLLKo8mcaWXBLJ8_apWWoYtgjSLQRmBkYf7GPrKzXPoCJ-
  24. Warley, C. (Ed.). (2025). At the Foot of the Mountain of Purgatory. In Auerbach’s Renaissance: Re-births of an Aesthetic from Shakespeare to Ferrante (pp. 61–89). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009545457.004
  25. Wilken, R. L. (2003). The Spirit of Early Christian Thought: Seeking the Face of God. Yale University Press.
  26. Zakai, A. (2016). Erich Auerbach and the Crisis of German Philology: The Humanist Tradition in Peril. Springer International Publishing AG.
  27. Zakai, A., & Weinstein, D. (2012). Erich Auerbach and His “Figura”: An Apology for the Old Testament in an Age of Aryan Philology. Religions, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3020320