Spatial Construction and Grassroots Willingness to Participate in Democracy: Analytical Framework and Empirical Tests
Abstract
In China, political participation exists as a mainstream understanding of democratic politics. There are many factors that influence citizens' willingness to participate, often pointing to some form of "space", but few studies have explored the relevance of different forms of space to the willingness to participate in democracy. This study focuses on the grassroots space of NPC deputies' contact stations in China and utilizes data collected from 185 contact stations for empirical analysis. The study adopts the physical, interactional and digital spaces identified in established research and operationalizes their variable indicators, on the basis of which an analytical framework is constructed and hypotheses are formulated. The empirical results show that there is a significant positive correlation between the improvement of the three types of spatial conditions and the willingness to participate in grassroots democracy. It has been proved that promoting grassroots democratic participation willingness through spatial constructs has a positive performance. This study aims to make an empirical test to support the spatial examination of democratic participation and provide an understanding of the spatial construction of grassroots democracy in China.
Keywords
Spatial Construction, Democratic Participation, Grassroots Democracy, NPC Deputies' Contact Stations
References
- Dzur Albert W, and Hendriks Carolyn M.2018.Thick populism: democracy-enhancing popular participation. Policy Studies 39:334-351.
- Butzlaff Felix.2023. Consenting Participation? How Demands for Citizen Participation and Expert-Led Decision-Making Are Reconciled in Local Democracy. Political Studies Review 21:340-356.
- Michels Ank, and De Graaf Laurens. 2017. Examining citizen participation: local participatory policymaking and democracy revisited. Local Government Studies 43:875-881.
- Yan Yu, Li Zhenzhen and Meng Tianguang. 2024. Conceptions of democracy in China: New evidence from the structural topic model. International Political Science Review.
- Peng Hu. 2018. Popular understanding of democracy in contemporary China. Democratization 25:1441-1459.
- Oh Youngmin, and Lim Seunghoo. 2018. Connecting a missing link between participation in administration and political participation: the mediating role of political efficacy. International Review of Administrative Sciences 83:694-716.
- Oser Jennifer, Grinson Amit, Boulianne Shelley and Halperin Eran.2022. How Political Efficacy Relates to Online and Offline Political Participation: A Multilevel Meta-analysis. Political Communication 39:607-633.
- Ouattara Ebe, and Steenvoorden Eefie. 2023. The Elusive Effect of Political Trust on Participation: Participatory Resource or (Dis)incentive? Political Studies.
- Cicatiello Lorenzo, Ercolano Salvatore and Gaeta Giuseppe Lucio. 2015. Income distribution and political participation: a multilevel analysis. Empirica 42:447-479.
- Reichert Frank. 2018. How important are political interest and internal political efficacy in the prediction of political participation? Longitudinal evidence from Germany. Revista De Psicologia Social 33:459-503.
- Levy Brett L.M, and Akiva Thomas. 2019. Motivating Political Participation Among Youth: An Analysis of Factors Related to Adolescents' Political Engagement. Political Psychology 40:1039-1055.
- Fazekas Zoltan, and Hatemi Peter K. 2021. Narcissism in Political Participation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 47:347-361.
- Page Douglas. 2018. When Does Sexuality-Based Discrimination Motivate Political Participation? Political Psychology 39:1013-1030.
- Liu Shan-Jan Sarah. 2022. Gender gaps in political participation in Asia. International Political Science Review 43:209-225.
- Abdo-Katsipis Carla B. 2017. Women, Political Participation, and the Arab Spring: Political Awareness and Participation in Democratizing Tunisia. Journal of Women Politics & Policy 38:413-429.
- Willeck Claire, and Mendelberg Tali. 2022. Education and Political Participation. Annual Review of Political Science 25:89-110.
- McDonnell Joshua. 2020. Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: a systematic review. Local Government Studies 46:331-350.
- Theocharis Yannis, Boulianne Shelley, Koc-Michalska Karolina and Bimber Bruce. 2023. Platform affordances and political participation: how social media reshape political engagement. West European Politics 46:788-811.
- Rice Laurie L, Moffett Kenneth W and Madupalli Ramana. 2013. Campaign-Related Social Networking and the Political Participation of College Students. Social Science Computer Review 31:257-279.
- Purcell Mark. 2021. Space and the desire for democracy in the 15M.Transactions of The Institute of British Geocraphers 46:223-235.
- Makakavhule Kundani, and Landman Karina. 2020. Towards deliberative democracy through the democratic governance and design of public spaces in the South African capital city, Tshwane. Urban Design International 25:280-292.
- Ulmer Jasmine B.2017.Writing Urban Space: Street Art, Democracy, and Photographic Cartography. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies 17:491-502.
- Wilde Matt.2017.Contested Spaces The Communal Councils and Participatory Democracy in Chavez's Venezuela. Latin American Perspectives 44:140-158.
- Taylor-Smith Ella, and Smith Colin F.2019.Investigating the online and offline contexts of day-to-day democracy as participation spaces. Information Communication & Society 22:1853-1870.
- Crossan John, Featherstone David, Hayes Fiona, Hughes Helen and McDonald Isobel. 2023. Colours of democracy: Trade union banners and the contested articulations of democratic spatial practices. Transactions of The Institute of British Geographers 48:23-38.
- Martínez-Bascuñán Mariam. 2015. Democracy and social networks: the Twitter example. Revista De Estudios Politicos 138:175-198.
- Williams Philippa, Kamra Lipika, Johar Pushpendra, Khan Fatma Matin, Kumar Mukesh and Oza Ekta.2022. No Room for Dissent: Domesticating WhatsApp, Digital Private Spaces and Lived Democracy in India. Antipode 54:305-330.